2006 BMW 325 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse (277 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse (361 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 325 | 2013 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 325 | Traverse |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2997 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 277 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 361 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5173 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1991 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1846 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 83 L |
