2006 BMW 325 vs. 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN
To start off, 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN (353 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 325 | 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 325 | GRAND CARAVAN |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 279 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5151 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2247 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3078 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 76 L |