2006 BMW 325 vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 325 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 325 | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 325 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 5700 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.9 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1955 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 17.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 100 L |