2006 BMW 525 vs. 1963 Rover P6
To start off, 2006 BMW 525 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover P6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover P6 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 525 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 525 (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1963 Rover P6. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover P6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 525 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover P6. (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 525 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover P6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 525 | 1963 Rover P6 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 525 | P6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 54 L |