2006 BMW 525 vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2006 BMW 525 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 846 kg more than 2006 BMW 525.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 525 | 1978 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 525 | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 2206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 107 L |