2006 BMW 525 vs. 2000 Subaru Forester

To start off, 2006 BMW 525 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Subaru Forester. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Subaru Forester would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 BMW 525 is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2000 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 525 (251 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Subaru Forester. (186 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 525 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Subaru Forester.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW 525 2000 Subaru Forester
Make BMW Subaru
Model 525 Forester
Year Released 2006 2000
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2999 cc 1994 cc
Horse Power 215 HP 0 HP
Torque 251 Nm 186 Nm
Engine Bore Size 85.1 mm 91.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87.9 mm 74.9 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4470 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2680 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]