2006 BMW 525 vs. 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser
To start off, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 525 would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 BMW 525 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 525 (215 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (178 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Because 2006 BMW 525 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 525. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 525 (251 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser. (210 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 525 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 525 | 2009 Chrysler PT Dream Cruiser | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 525 | PT Dream Cruiser |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 2397 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 178 HP |
Torque | 251 Nm | 210 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |