2006 BMW 525 vs. 2009 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 525 would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 525 (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. (173 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2006 BMW 525 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 525. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Voyager (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 525. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 525 | 2009 Chrysler Voyager | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | 525 | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 3301 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 278 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 12.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |
