2006 BMW 525 vs. 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago
To start off, 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 525 would be higher. At 6,496 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago (631 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 416 more horse power than 2006 BMW 525. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 525.
Because 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago (660 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 525. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 525 | 2009 Lamborghini Murcielago | |
| Make | BMW | Lamborghini |
| Model | 525 | Murcielago |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 6496 cc |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 631 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 660 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 29.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |
