2006 BMW 530 vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2006 BMW 530 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,979 cc, 2006 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 530 (23 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 530 weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 530 | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 530 | 2CV |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 425 cc |
Horse Power | 23 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |