2006 BMW 530 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2006 BMW 530 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2006 BMW 530. (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 430 kg more than 2006 BMW 530. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 530 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 530 | Calais |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2991 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 103.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3300 mm |