2006 BMW 530 vs. 2000 Caterham 21
To start off, 2006 BMW 530 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 21 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 530 (255 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Caterham 21. (230 HP @ 8600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham 21.
Because 2006 BMW 530 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham 21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW 530 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 530 (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 21. (210 Nm @ 7200 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 21.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 530 | 2000 Caterham 21 | |
Make | BMW | Caterham |
Model | 530 | 21 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 8600 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 89.3 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |