2006 BMW 530 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 BMW 530 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 530 (255 HP) has 185 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 530 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 530 (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 530 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 530 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1810 mm |