2006 BMW 530 vs. 2003 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2006 BMW 530 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2006 BMW 530. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 530 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 530 (480 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar XK. (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar XK.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW 530 2003 Jaguar XK
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 530 XK
Year Released 2006 2003
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 3996 cc
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 201 HP 290 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 480 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1835 kg 1700 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 75 L