2006 BMW 530 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2006 BMW 530 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,979 cc, 2006 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2006 BMW 530. (23 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 530 weights approximately 660 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 2006 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 530 (300 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 530 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 530 | Smart |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1124 cc |
Horse Power | 23 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |