2006 BMW 530 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 530 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2006 BMW 530. (255 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 530.

Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 530. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 530. (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 530.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW 530 2010 Jeep Commander
Make BMW Jeep
Model 530 Commander
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2999 cc 5652 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 255 HP 322 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 500 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 99.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 90.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1830 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10 L/100km 15.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 78 L