2006 BMW 545 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 BMW 545 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 545 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2002 Volvo XC90. (268 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 545 should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 545. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 545 (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo XC90. (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 545 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | 545 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2922 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.8 seconds | 9.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1900 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 12.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |
