2006 BMW 545 vs. 2003 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2006 BMW 545 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 2,494 cc, 2006 BMW 545 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 545 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 545 should accelerate faster than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 2006 BMW 545 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 545. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 545 (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 545 | 2003 Daewoo Matiz | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 545 | Matiz |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 994 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |