2006 BMW 545 vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2006 BMW 545 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 2,494 cc, 2006 BMW 545 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 545 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 545 should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 545 (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 545 | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | BMW | MG |
Model | 545 | TF |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 1588 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.8 seconds | 10.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |