2006 BMW 545 vs. 2004 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2006 BMW 545 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZT-T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZT-T would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 545 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT-T. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 545 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT-T.
Because 2006 BMW 545 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 545. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 MG ZT-T, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 545 (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZT-T. (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZT-T.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 545 | 2004 MG ZT-T | |
Make | BMW | MG |
Model | 545 | ZT-T |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.8 seconds | 9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |