2006 BMW 545 vs. 2008 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 545. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 545 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 545 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac STS. (321 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 545 should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 545 (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac STS. (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 545 | 2008 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 545 | STS |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 4565 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.8 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1850 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 14.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 66 L |
