2006 BMW 545 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 545. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 545 would be higher. At 2,494 cc, 2006 BMW 545 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 545 (328 HP) has 175 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 545 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 BMW 545 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 545. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 545 (450 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 545 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | 545 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2492 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
