2006 BMW 545 vs. 2012 Mazda 5
To start off, 2012 Mazda 5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 545. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 545 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 545 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 545 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 5.
Because 2006 BMW 545 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 545. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 545 (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mazda 5. (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 545 | 2012 Mazda 5 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 545 | 5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2500 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |