2006 BMW 550 vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2006 BMW 550 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 550 | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 550 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 6390 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 198 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
