2006 BMW 550 vs. 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2006 BMW 550 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 BMW 550 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 550. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 550 | 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 550 | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3301 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 179 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |