2006 BMW 550 vs. 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover
To start off, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 550. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 550 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2006 BMW 550 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 550. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 550 | 2013 Land Rover ALL-NEW Range Rover | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | 550 | ALL-NEW Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2013 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 370 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.5 seconds | 6.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
