2006 BMW 650 vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 BMW 650 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,801 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 BMW 650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 650 (360 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1995 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 650 should accelerate faster than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Because 2006 BMW 650 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 650. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 650 (488 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 334 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 650 | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 650 | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4801 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 488 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |