2006 BMW 650 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2006 BMW 650 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 BMW 650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 650 (360 HP) has 290 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 650 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 650 weights approximately 990 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 650 (488 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: