2006 BMW 650 vs. 2009 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 650 would be higher. At 4,801 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 BMW 650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 650 (360 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Sable. (263 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 650 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Sable.

Because 2009 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW 650. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 650 (488 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Sable. (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Sable.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW 650 2009 Mercury Sable
Make BMW Mercury
Model 650 Sable
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4801 cc 3496 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 360 HP 263 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 488 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 5140 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase Size 2790 mm 2870 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.2 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.4 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 78 L