2006 BMW 650 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 650. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 650 would be higher. At 4,801 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 BMW 650 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 650 (360 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 650 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 BMW 650 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 650. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 650 (488 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 650 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 650 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | 650 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4801 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 488 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
