2006 BMW 745 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 745. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 745 would be higher. At 4,423 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 BMW 745 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 745 (325 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (237 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 745 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 745 (700 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jaguar XF. (500 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 745 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 745 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 745 | XF |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4423 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 700 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.6 seconds | 6.7 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 70 L |
