2006 BMW 760 vs. 1958 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2006 BMW 760 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 760 (439 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac Sixty. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 145 kg more than 2006 BMW 760.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW 760 | 1958 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 760 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5972 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 439 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3390 mm |
