2006 BMW 760 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2006 BMW 760 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,972 cc (12 cylinders), 2006 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 760 (439 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW 760 weights approximately 540 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 760 (600 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 760 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 760 | Dakota |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 439 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 600 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2225 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.6 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 83 L |