2006 BMW 760 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW 760 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 760 (439 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2010 Holden Commodore. (360 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 760 (600 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2006 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Commodore. 2006 BMW 760 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW 760 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 760 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 760 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 439 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 600 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |