2006 BMW M3 vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 2006 BMW M3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M3 (355 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW M3 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW M3 | 1964 DKW Munga | |
| Make | BMW | DKW |
| Model | M3 | Munga |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 355 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 31 L |
