2006 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Holden EH

To start off, 2006 BMW M3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW M3 weights approximately 434 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M3 (365 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2006 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW M3 1964 Holden EH
Make BMW Holden
Model M3 EH
Year Released 2006 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3246 cc 2928 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 338 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4900 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 365 Nm 237 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 1600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1549 kg 1115 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2670 mm