2006 BMW M3 vs. 1992 Renault Racoon
To start off, 2006 BMW M3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Racoon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Racoon would be higher. At 3,244 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1992 Renault Racoon. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Racoon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW M3 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1992 Renault Racoon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Renault Racoon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Racoon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M3 (365 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Racoon. (107 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Racoon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW M3 | 1992 Renault Racoon | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | M3 | Racoon |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3244 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 338 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1005 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2770 mm |
