2006 BMW M3 vs. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2006 BMW M3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M3 (355 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 20 kg more than 2006 BMW M3.
Because 2006 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M3 | 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | M3 | Arcadia |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 3206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4960 mm |