2006 BMW M3 vs. 1996 Daewoo Nexia
To start off, 2006 BMW M3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Nexia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Nexia would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M3 (355 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 2006 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M3 (370 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. 1996 Daewoo Nexia has automatic transmission and 2006 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2006 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Daewoo Nexia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M3 | 1996 Daewoo Nexia | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | M3 | Nexia |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 355 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |