2006 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2006 BMW M3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jaguar XK (450 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2006 BMW M3. (338 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jaguar XK weights approximately 16 kg more than 2006 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jaguar XK (604 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW M3. (365 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1999 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW M3. 1999 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2006 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2006 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW M3 1999 Jaguar XK
Make BMW Jaguar
Model M3 XK
Year Released 2006 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3246 cc 3995 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 338 HP 450 HP
Engine RPM 4900 RPM 6150 RPM
Torque 365 Nm 604 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 91 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.5:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1549 kg 1565 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1140 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]