2006 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Kia Rondo

To start off, 2010 Kia Rondo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,244 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2010 Kia Rondo. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Rondo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW M3 weights approximately 140 kg more than 2010 Kia Rondo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Rondo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M3 (365 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Rondo. (169 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Rondo. 2010 Kia Rondo has automatic transmission and 2006 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2006 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Rondo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW M3 2010 Kia Rondo
Make BMW Kia
Model M3 Rondo
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type Convertible Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3244 cc 2399 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 338 HP 173 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 365 Nm 169 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 12.0:1 17.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1655 kg 1515 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.1 L/100km 10.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 60 L