2006 BMW M5 vs. 2008 Kia Amanti

To start off, 2008 Kia Amanti is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M5 would be higher. At 4,998 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M5 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 2008 Kia Amanti. (260 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 2008 Kia Amanti.

Because 2006 BMW M5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Kia Amanti. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW M5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M5 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Kia Amanti. (261 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Kia Amanti. 2008 Kia Amanti has automatic transmission and 2006 BMW M5 has manual transmission. 2006 BMW M5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Kia Amanti will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW M5 2008 Kia Amanti
Make BMW Kia
Model M5 Amanti
Year Released 2006 2008
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4998 cc 3778 cc
Engine Cylinders 10 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 500 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 7750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 519 Nm 261 Nm
Torque RPM 6100 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1860 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 13.1 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 19.6 L/100km 13.8 L/100km