2006 BMW M6 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW M6. (519 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW M6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M6 | 62 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4997 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 519 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |