2006 BMW M6 vs. 1966 Simca 1300
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 449 more horse power than 1966 Simca 1300. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Simca 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Simca 1300. (102 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Simca 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 1966 Simca 1300 | |
Make | BMW | Simca |
Model | M6 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4997 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 519 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |