2006 BMW M6 vs. 1982 Volvo 260
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 347 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 260. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 260. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 1982 Volvo 260 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | M6 | 260 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4997 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 519 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2660 mm |