2006 BMW M6 vs. 1992 Mazda 323
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 1992 Mazda 323. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda 323.
Because 1992 Mazda 323 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW M6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 323 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 323. (235 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 1992 Mazda 323 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M6 | 323 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4997 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 519 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 8.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |