2006 BMW M6 vs. 2000 Citroen C3
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 435 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3.
Because 2006 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 587 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (118 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3. 2006 BMW M6 has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW M6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 2000 Citroen C3 | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | M6 | C3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 507 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 705 Nm | 118 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 14.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1540 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |