2006 BMW M6 vs. 2000 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 399 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2006 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 555 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (150 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 2000 Citroen Xsara | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | M6 | Xsara |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 507 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 705 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |