2006 BMW M6 vs. 2003 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 406 more horse power than 2003 Skoda Octavia. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Skoda Octavia.
Because 2006 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 465 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Skoda Octavia. (240 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Skoda Octavia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW M6 | 2003 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | BMW | Skoda |
| Model | M6 | Octavia |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 101 HP |
| Torque | 705 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 19.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |
