2006 BMW M6 vs. 2003 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 290 more horse power than 2003 SsangYong Musso. (217 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2003 SsangYong Musso.
Because 2003 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW M6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 SsangYong Musso. (319 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW M6 | 2003 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | BMW | SsangYong |
| Model | M6 | Musso |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 705 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 16.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 73 L |
